Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) in Six Sigma

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis

One of the critical tools within the Six Sigma arsenal is Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). FMEA is a systematic approach to identifying and mitigating potential failure modes within a process, product, or system. By incorporating FMEA into their Six Sigma projects, companies can proactively address weaknesses and vulnerabilities, ultimately improving product quality and customer satisfaction.

The Role of FMEA in Six Sigma

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a systematic approach employed within the Define and Analyze phases of Six Sigma projects.

Its purpose is to anticipate and mitigate potential process failures, defects, or deviations. By addressing these issues before they occur, FMEA aids in establishing robust processes that consistently meet or exceed customer expectations.

  1. Identifying Potential Failure Modes
    In the Define phase, the project team outlines the problem and identifies the project scope. This is where FMEA comes into play. The team identifies potential failure modes by examining the process from start to finish. These failure modes encompass any instance where the process might deviate from the desired outcome. Each failure mode is assessed based on severity, occurrence, and detection.

  1. Evaluating the Effects of Failure
    In the Analyze phase, the team assesses the potential effects of each identified failure mode. This evaluation considers factors like safety risks, impact on product quality, customer satisfaction, and production costs. The goal is to prioritize which failure modes have the most significant potential impact on the process.

  1. Risk Prioritization
    The heart of FMEA in Six Sigma lies in prioritizing risk. This is done by assigning a risk priority number (RPN) to each failure mode. RPN is calculated by multiplying each failure mode’s severity, occurrence, and detection ratings. High RPN values indicate significant risks, warranting immediate attention.

  1. Developing Mitigation Strategies
    Once the most critical failure modes are identified, the project team can then focus on developing mitigation strategies. This involves implementing changes to reduce the severity, occurrence, or improve the detection of these failure modes. The primary aim is to reduce RPN values, thereby enhancing the overall robustness of the process.

  1. Monitoring and Control
    In the Improve and Control phases, the project team implements the changes and closely monitors the process to ensure effective mitigation strategies. Continuous improvement and control mechanisms are established to maintain the desired level of performance.

Benefits of FMEA in Six Sigma

Integrating FMEA into Six Sigma projects offers several benefits:

  1. Proactive Risk Management: FMEA allows organizations to proactively address potential issues before they result in defects or costly failures.

  2. Enhanced Product Quality: Product quality is significantly improved by systematically identifying and mitigating failure modes, leading to higher customer satisfaction.

  3. Cost Reduction: Identifying and resolving issues before they become major problems helps reduce production costs and avoid expensive rework.

  4. Data-Driven Decision Making: FMEA relies on data and analysis to make informed decisions, aligning with the data-driven approach of Six Sigma.

  5. Standardization: FMEA encourages the development of standardized processes, which enhances consistency and efficiency.

FMEA in the Hands of Six Sigma Green Belts and Black Belts

Six Sigma is a structured methodology that relies on a hierarchy of trained professionals, including Six Sigma Green Belts and Six Sigma Black Belts, to drive process improvement initiatives. Each of these roles has specific responsibilities and levels of expertise, and they use Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) in different capacities during Six Sigma projects.

Data Collection and Initial Analysis: Six Sigma Green Belts typically assist with data collection and initial analysis during a Six Sigma project’s Define and Measure phases. They help identify process-related problems and work closely with process owners and stakeholders.

FMEA Training: Green Belts receive training in FMEA techniques and often collaborate with cross-functional teams to identify potential failure modes and evaluate their severity, occurrence, and detection.

Supporting Mitigation Strategies: Green Belts play a vital role in assisting Black Belts and process owners in implementing mitigation strategies. They help gather additional data and work on solutions to reduce the severity, occurrence, or improve the detection of identified failure modes.

Leadership and Oversight: Six Sigma Black Belts take on a more prominent leadership role in Six Sigma projects. They lead cross-functional teams through all phases, ensuring project alignment with organizational goals.

In-Depth FMEA Expertise: Black Belts are typically FMEA experts and guide the project team in systematically identifying potential failure modes and calculating risk priority numbers (RPNs). They are well-versed in FMEA techniques and play a critical role in evaluating and prioritizing failure modes.

Strategic Decision-Making: Black Belts make strategic decisions based on the FMEA results, identifying the most critical risks that need immediate attention. They collaborate with Green Belts and the team to develop and implement effective mitigation strategies.

Continuous Monitoring and Control: Black Belts ensure that mitigation strategies are effectively implemented and continually monitored. They establish control mechanisms to sustain the desired level of performance and quality.

Collaboration between Green Belts and Black Belts

FMEA in Six Sigma projects often involves a collaborative effort between Six Sigma Green Belts and Black Belts. Green Belts, with their specific expertise in data collection and analysis, play a supportive role in the early stages of the project. With their deeper understanding of FMEA and leadership capabilities, Black Belts guide the entire process from identification to mitigation of potential failure modes.

This collaboration allows for a well-rounded approach to FMEA, leveraging the strengths of both Green Belts and Black Belts. Green Belts can ensure that data-driven decision-making is at the core of FMEA, while Black Belts bring the strategic direction and expertise required to address the most critical risks and deliver significant process improvements.

Six Sigma Green Belts and Black Belts play complementary roles in the application of FMEA during Six Sigma projects. Their combined efforts and expertise in FMEA techniques ensure that potential failure modes are thoroughly identified, evaluated, and effectively mitigated, contributing to the overarching goal of process improvement and defect reduction.

Pitfalls of FMEA in Six Sigma Projects

While Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a powerful tool in Six Sigma projects, it is not without its potential pitfalls. Understanding these challenges is crucial for successfully implementing FMEA as part of a Six Sigma initiative. Here are some common pitfalls to be aware of:

1. Overly Complex FMEA Documents:

One of the primary pitfalls is creating FMEA documents that are overly complex or laden with excessive detail. This can lead to confusion and inefficiency in the project team. It’s essential to strike a balance between thorough analysis and practical usability.

2. Incomplete Data or Assumptions:

FMEA relies heavily on data and accurate assumptions. If the data is incomplete or assumptions are incorrect, the analysis may misidentify potential failure modes or their associated risks, leading to ineffective mitigation strategies.

3. Bias and Subjectivity:

Human bias can influence the evaluation of severity, occurrence, and detection ratings. This subjectivity can lead to inconsistencies in risk assessment. Ensuring objectivity and utilizing data-driven assessments is crucial to avoid this pitfall.

4. Neglecting Occurrence and Detection:

Often, more emphasis is placed on the severity of failure modes while neglecting the occurrence and detection ratings. A failure to address these aspects can lead to the underestimation of potential risks.

5. Lack of Cross-Functional Collaboration:

FMEA is most effective when conducted by cross-functional teams with diverse expertise. A pitfall is a lack of collaboration or input from relevant stakeholders, which can result in missed risks and inadequate mitigation strategies.

6. Failure to Prioritize Risks Adequately:

FMEA assigns a Risk Priority Number (RPN) to each failure mode based on the severity, occurrence, and detection ratings. A common pitfall is prioritizing risks solely based on RPN values without considering factors like customer impact or strategic importance.

7. Static Approach:

FMEA should not be a one-time activity. Some projects fall into the pitfall of treating it as a static process, failing to revisit and update it regularly. As processes evolve, so do the associated risks, necessitating continuous FMEA reviews.

8. Ignoring the Human Element:

Sometimes, FMEA overlooks the potential for human errors and behavior as a failure mode. Neglecting the human element in processes can lead to significant issues, particularly in industries where human intervention is crucial.

9. Lack of Management Support:

Without adequate support from organizational leadership, FMEA can be challenging to implement effectively. The lack of resources, commitment, or buy-in from upper management can hinder the success of FMEA in Six Sigma projects.

10. Inadequate Training:

FMEA requires a specific skill set to be used effectively. Inadequate training for project teams can result in suboptimal FMEA outcomes. Investing in training and development is essential to mitigate this pitfall.

11. Complexity Overkill:

Sometimes, teams may become too absorbed in the analysis and complexities of FMEA. This over-analysis can lead to project delays and overcomplicate the implementation of mitigation strategies.

12. Misalignment with Organizational Goals:

Another pitfall is when FMEA efforts are not aligned with the organization’s strategic goals. It’s essential to ensure that FMEA is focused on the most critical issues that impact the organization’s bottom line and customer satisfaction.

13. Over-Reliance on FMEA Alone:

While FMEA is a valuable tool, it should not be the sole method for identifying and mitigating risks. Combining FMEA with other quality and process improvement tools can lead to more comprehensive results.

Mitigating Pitfalls

Mitigating the pitfalls associated with Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) in Six Sigma projects requires a multifaceted approach. First and foremost, investing in training and education for team members involved in FMEA is essential to reduce subjectivity and enhance the quality of analysis. Standardized templates can help streamline the process, fostering consistency and clarity in FMEA documents.

Cross-functional collaboration is crucial, ensuring a comprehensive analysis involving individuals with diverse expertise. Data-driven assessments, periodic reviews of FMEA documents, and strong leadership support are also key components in successful FMEA implementation. Moreover, prioritizing critical risks, maintaining a balanced approach to analysis, considering the human element, and combining FMEA with other relevant tools in the Six Sigma toolbox can help organizations avoid the common pitfalls that may hinder the effectiveness of FMEA.

In addition to these strategies, aligning FMEA efforts with the overarching organizational goals is crucial, ensuring that FMEA activities directly impact customer satisfaction, product quality, and overall business success. By following these mitigation measures and maintaining a proactive approach, organizations can harness the full potential of FMEA as a robust asset in their quest for operational excellence, defect reduction, and continuous improvement in the realm of Six Sigma.


Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) plays a pivotal role in the Six Sigma methodology. It empowers organizations to proactively address potential process failures, improve product quality, and enhance customer satisfaction. By integrating FMEA into the Define and Analyze phases of Six Sigma projects, companies can systematically identify, evaluate, and mitigate risks, ultimately driving their journey toward operational excellence and minimizing defects in their processes.

Learn More